This one, i like due to the depth it seems to have. It feels like i could reach into the screen past the first layer f what is portrayed and touch the things all the way i the back of the image.
I especially like this image cause it feels like it should start moving at any minute. that the ladder should retract, or the truck should start moving. As with the last image, it also has a nice feeling of depth as if i could reach into it
This one might be my favorite. I like how looking at it without the glasses, once you look past the 3D changes, its just there. But once the glasses are on, it feels like its more in the background rathe than the foreground
This one is a close second to the one above. I like how this one is a created image rather than a taken picture made 3D. I also like how with the larger version of this image, it almost feels like i could walk down the hallway
All the images above i believe are quite strong. They all have a god depth of feel, the 3D works quite well, and once the glasses are on, the 3D works excellently.
This image, though it seems to work at first is actually faulted. Though it cannot be seen in the smaller image, once the larger one is pulled up, there are still doubles of certain aspects such as the dials, the tailgate, and a few other areas. While there are many other images that i'm sure are worse, i wanted to go with something more subtle, for i feel if i can learn to avoid minor trouble, that will also help me avoid worse versions of the same problem by being somewhat "picky."
These ARE some nice examples. That one of the statues on the church exterior is GORGEOUS in the way you can make out the concave depressions and all. I'm with you on the last image, too. The dials sort of stand out from the rest of the image, but otherwise it's very flat.
ReplyDelete